Rabu, 04 Maret 2015

Leaving Mystical Things in Modern Era

Modernism is originally arising in the late 19th century and early 20th century. The term is used as opposed to the "traditional" forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life that were becoming outdated in the new economic, social, and political conditions. In the era which is full of innovation in various fields, such as technology, transportation, and communication, people’s mindset becomes more logical and rational. Most of them had left the traditional thinking which is related to mystical things. It is shown by some literary works at that time, some of which are Oscar Wilde’s short stories, “The Canterville Ghost” and “Lord Arthur  Sevile’s Crime”.

The modernism is clearly visible in “The Canterville Ghost” as the narrator mentions that Otis family are modern Americans. No one in that family believe about ghost that people are telling has haunted the house they have purchased. They are not scared at all even though the owner of the place himself warns about the ghost. However, the modernism is represented by Americans who move to England, while the British still believe and are scared of ghost. Since at that time England was still in the beginning of modernism era, Wilde intends to bring the contrast between American who already had modern thinking and British who still had traditional mindset. Mr. Hiram B. Otis, an American Minister, and his family unhesitatingly move to Canterville Chase of which people are scared. It is seen that Wilde tries to change people who still think that kind of unreal things matter.

Canterville Chase is an old English country house which actually is a traditional haunted house. The Gothic setting which is apperently real is enough to symbolize the traditional belief in England. Wilde criticizes British people who was still have traditional mindset in technological era. On the other side, he also satirizes the materialistic American that do not mind anything not in the form of material. Mr. Otis even jokingly says that he “will take the furniture and the ghost at valuation” when Lord Canterville tells about the ghost in that house. He then continues, “I come from a modern country, where we have everything that money can buy.” He generalizes the opinion by bringing the country, that indicates Wilde’s view about American.
This story seems like a horror story by involving ghost that usually will scare the reader. But in fact, it is more like a parody of horror story due to the nonexistence of terrifying scene. The figure of ghost that shoud have been scary and brings darkness to the story, instead looks ridiculous and even could bring laughter. 

Moreover, the narration mostly shows the ghost’s perspective so that we see the unusual ghost’s image. Normally in other stories, ghost is mysterious and brings the feeling of terror, but here we can see the ghost whose name Sir Simon, like a comedy, do foolish things to threaten the Otis family. He absurdly describes his being a ghost as a career and he does it like normal people do their job, like choosing clothes to scare people, or using the paints he steals from Virginia, Mr. Otis’ daughter, to create bloodstains on the floor. He is even scared when he sees the fake ghost made by the twins and often tricked by them.

Not only the depiction of ghost which is not ordinary, but also the way the Otis family treat the ghost. At first, they do not believe that ghosts exist, but as they see strange things happen, they begin to consider the ghost’s existence in the house. However, it still does not make them scared, instead they find it quite interesting. The way they think so logically makes it more illogical since the reaction of every mysterious phenomenon are very unexpected. For example, when Mrs. Umney, the housekeeper, tells Washington Otis the story of bloodstains in the library:

It is the blood of Lady Eleanore de Canterville, who was murdered on that very spot by her own husband, Sir Simon de Canterville, in 1575. Sir Simon survived her nine years, and disappeared suddenly under very mysterious circumstances. His body has never been discovered, but his guilty spirit still haunts the Chase. The blood-stain has been much admired by tourists and others, and cannot be removed.'” (Wilde 1891)

He answers with, “That is all nonsense.” It is not for the fact that it is the ghost’s blood and all as the reader would think, but it is for the fact that the blood cannot be removed. Then he naturally uses Pinkerton’s Champion Stain Remover and Paragon Detergent to clean it up, that proves that in fact it can be removed, though it comes again later. He ignores all the stuffs related to supernatural and only mind the physical things. In addition, a terrible flash of lightning that happens afterwards only makes the American minister whines about the climate, instead of being frightened because of the mystic aura. Even when he himself sees the frightening appearance of the ghost after hearing sounds of the clank of metal at the midnight, he still shows his calmness that makes the ghost offended.

'My dear sir,' said Mr. Otis [to the ghost], 'I really must insist on your oiling those chains, and have brought you for that purpose a small bottle of the Tammany Rising Sun Lubricator. It is said to be completely efficacious upon one application, and there are several testimonials to that effect on the wrapper from some of our most eminent native divines. I shall leave it here for you by the bedroom candles, and will be happy to supply you with more should you require it.' (Wilde 1891)

Besides the modernism that the Otis family brings from America, the traditional English is also shown in Mrs. Umney. She is the representative of British that has disadvantage because she is scared of ghost and faints when hears the thunder. It looks like a mockery to British people who still think traditionally. Different with the Otises that has no problem since they do not think ghost as a thing that they should be scared of, but instead they treat him just like a human, and actually it gives the ghost humiliation.

However, the short story has an emotional happy ending as the character Virginia finds Sir Simon, the ghost,  sitting by the window with “extreme depression.” She talks to him and they go through some misunderstanding, until Sir Simon asks her to help him go to Death beyond the pine woods, which she agrees. Once again, Wilde turns the scary image of ghost to an emotional creature. Then, for the first time we can see the whole Otis family feel scared and panic which is caused by the missing of Virginia. What scares and worries them are just rational things, like missing their family. Then she returns and makes her family relieved. She brings a box of beatiful jewels given by the ghost, showing their friendship, that she wears when she is married with Duke of Cheshire.

Another Wilde’s short story that indicates the modenism era is “Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime”. In oppisite of “The Canterville Ghost”, the main character in “Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime” does not show logical thinking like modern people in the former story. Lord Arthur, the main character, still believes in mystical things, such as fortune telling, that brings him difficulty. He gets tricked by Mr. Podgers, the cheiromantist, when he looks so terrified after reading his palm. Lord Arthur suspects  Mr. Septimus Podgers does not tell truth when he says the fortune that he will lose a distant relative. He thinks that the fortune teller hides something more than that, and insists him to tell what he really has seen and even pay him to hear “the truth”.  He feels so down and depressed after hearing that “murder” is what the cheiromatist has seen on his hand.  He does not know why he wants to murder someone because he does not have anyone to kill or the reason of it. But it always haunts him and he believes that he will become a murderer.

The short story also shows absurdity when Lord Arthur see the fortune telling as his duty, although in fact there is nothing that makes him should do the murder. When he remembers about his lover, Sybil Merton, whom he will marry not long after, he realizes that he cannot marry her before he does the murder because he does not want her to live with him in “terror of wrongdoing.” Thus, he decides to postpone the marriage until he commits the murder. It becomes more absurd since he looks for someone who is available to kill. Irronically, the narrator, with the perspective of Lord Arthur says, “He had that rarest of all things, common sense,” when in fact, all he does and thinks are absurd.

After he convinces himself that what he does is not a sin, but a sacrifice out of duty for someone he loves, he chooses some candidates whom he will murder. After careful consideration, he decides to kill Lady Clementina Beauchamp, a dear old lady who lives in Curzon Street. Weirdly, when he has decided to do his “mission”, he does not feel “turbid feelings” anymore as before. The fact that he will kill someone that he thinks as a sin before no longer bothers him. He only thinks about Sybil and their marriage. “He [wonders] how he could have been so foolish as to rant and rave about the inevitable.” The inevitable actually is not inevitable since nothing rational that forces him to commit the murder if he does not believe that kind of mystical thing.

Lord Arthur does his murder mission just like his real job, and does not assume it as something dreadful because it is just his duty he has to fulfil. He does not consider murder as a terrible thing and he does not feel guilty at all when implementing his plan, instead he only feels anxiety and excitement whether his plan succeeds or not. He gives a poison to Lady Clementina that he claims as a medicine for her heartburn. He even does not feel bad in the slightest when she treats him so warmly when he comes to her house, or when she gives him her little house in Curzon Street and some other goods in her will after her death. All Lord Arthur feels is relief and happiness for he finally can marry the girl he really loves, that is ended after he knows that his aunt apperently has died a natural death. However, he looks for the second victim to make his “mission” succeeds. Finally he decides to kill his distant relative, the Dean of Chichester. He sends a bomb disguised as a carriage-clock from a Russian anarchist anonymously. His second attempt also ends to no avail since the bomb does not kill or damage anything, instead just makes tiny, harmless explosions that amuses Chichester family, especially the Dean’s son who plays with the clock happily. These kind of scenes just look like a comedy and it looks as ridiculous as the ghost’s attempt to scare the Otises in “The Canterville Ghost”.

The prophecy finally happens in reality when Lord Arthur kills Mr.Podgers by sinking him in the water when he has the chance. Ironically, the cheiromantist dies because of his own prophecy. It also shows that suggestion will work when it is believed. However, the story ends with a happy ending with the marriage of Lod Arthur and Sybil after the struggle he has gone through, which is actually absurd, the term that Albert Camus and Jean-Paul  Sartre (1940s) introduced as a recognition of their inability to find any rational explanation for human life. The term described what they understood as the fundamentally meaningless situation of humans in a confusing, hostile, and indifferent world. It is even becomes clearer that what Lord Arthur has done are meaningless when Lady Windermere tells Sybil that the cheiromantist is an impostor. However, Lord Arthur himself never knows the fact, even he belives that he owes his happy ending to cheiromancy.

In  modern era where technology had much more developed, Oscar Wilde wished to change people’s mindset in England at that time not to think traditionally anymore, especially mystical things that are not logical and rational. He makes such commedy stories to show the disadvantages of thinking in traditional way and the advantages of thinking in modern  way.

References:
“Modernism” (accessed on December 17th 2014) <http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Modernism.html>

“The Canterville Ghost” (accessed on December 17th 2014) <http://theghostofcanterville2008.es.tl/Book.htm>

Wilde, Oscar. (1891). “Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime”. Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime and Other Stories. Project Gutenberg EBook.


Wilde, Oscar. (1891). “The Canterville Ghost”. Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime and Other Stories. Project Gutenberg EBook.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar